Where compute can actually run.
We rank geographies based on electricity, permitting, cooling, connectivity, and execution risk so capital can focus on sites, not narratives.
Platform + fund thesis
Variable reports across scale / uptime and alpha / cost. The focus is power-ready sites and geographic deployment conditions. No company analysis.
Temporal Compute
Optimizes compute workloads to match when energy is abundant, not constant uptime.
Northern Chile
Chile · South America
Abundant solar, misaligned in time.
Not a classic hyperscale hub. A temporal-energy compute zone.
Paraguay
Paraguay · South America
Massive hydro. Underused advantage.
A high-potential energy node where compute could monetize underused electricity more effectively than traditional demand alone.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia · Middle East
State-backed speed and energy scale.
A sovereign-speed compute thesis where state capacity can compress timelines that remain slow elsewhere.
Alberta
Canada · North America
Gas-rich, pro-build, underwatched.
A serious North American candidate for power-linked compute that still feels underpriced in the broader conversation.
Iceland
Iceland · Europe
Cold, stable, power-rich.
A premium compute environment where climate and power quality materially improve operating conditions.
Québec
Canada · North America
Hydro-rich, stable, increasingly selective.
A high-quality power node for capital that prioritizes uptime, predictability, and long-duration viability.
West Texas
United States · North America
Scale first. Reliability via power strategy.
A scale node where compute expansion increasingly depends on pairing infrastructure with dedicated power.
Guayana
Venezuela · South America
Enormous energy potential. Weak delivery system.
A strategic long-horizon node where resource potential is high but system execution remains fragile.
Subscribe
Get updates
Constraint-first intelligence on where compute can actually run.